
Hello from the road,
We (my sister-in-law, her husband and I) spent the night in Sandusky, OH, after a long day of driving from the Quad Cities, and on our way back to drop me off in Bloomsburg before they arrive in New Jersey. It was a busy two weeks-plus back in Iowa for the holidays, and my primary duty was to manage the culinary requirements of people 5 to 75. All in all, it was quite enjoyable.
As we drove yesterday, we heard about the death of a 37 year old woman in a situation with an ICE agent. As in the case with George Floyd, the response to what happened has been swift and significant. Having lived in the Twin Cities for a number of years (albeit 40 years ago), Minneapolis/St. Paul is more diverse than many people expect. Additionally, the tapestry of cultures, the struggle with the continuum from the proverbial “Minnesota nice” and a national atmosphere of seemingly growing intolerance, has once again resulted in a tragedy. Before you think I have made some serious final deduction about what a reasonable response to this event in the prior 24 hours should be, I have not. As I listened to someone’s initial assessment of the events and then spent two-plus hours listening to both sides of the political spectrum last night, and more this morning, what is readily apparent – the politics of the country are front and center yet again. Furthermore, when you have the political incongruity that is between the State and Federal, there should be little surprise that we are once again facing a serious crisis. An administration that unabashedly announces they will go after blue states means there is no united in our country.
Before anyone decides to speak, be it a governor, a mayor, a Department Secretary or the President, it would behoove them all to understand the consequence of words. I am not saying there should be nothing said, but rather, choose words that will de-escalate versus fan the flames of contention that are on the verge of becoming another wildfire. Recently I wrote a blog that compared our national response following the deaths of Charlie Kirk this past year and George Floyd 5 years ago. The response to George Floyd was international. And certainly there is a national response now. I saw that protests against ICE and their tactics, used not only yesterday, but in Chicago, Portland, Los Angeles, to Washington DC, are being planned nationally from Portland to Miami and NYC to LA. Am I surprised that there is a national response to yesterday? I am not, but I hope (perhaps naively) that civility can prevail. Again, that requires thoughtful engagement at every level; there can definitely be decorum in anger though difficult. There can be restraint in the words used to allow for conversation about our national response following such a tragedy. And the tragedy is polymorphic for sure. Everyone is focused on a 37 year old woman, which is understandable. Certainly, I would hope the man who fired the shots is placed on administrative leave, and supported. I did read he had been dragged by a car in another incident, which I would believe influenced his behavior yesterday. Anyone who witnessed the event yesterday would certainly be traumatized. Another incident, regardless your political leaning should cause pause for each American citizen. The number of issues we face as a country are numerous, and their seriousness cannot be overstated, that is what I see from my little corner of the world.
Many mornings, I have breakfast or coffee with an incredible group of men, most of whom are more right leaning than I am. A good number of them are veterans, retired from working life-long jobs, and to say I am in the minority when it comes to our political ideology, and yet on many levels I appreciate and respect them while, at times, disagreeing stridently. To be bluntly candid, the number of times I heard “Fuck Biden” from that group might be more than our combined fingers and toes, but I had to choose my comments wisely and carefully. And yet, in spite of my difficulty with many of their positions, I could still respect them on other levels. I remember one asking me before the last election if I really planned to vote for Kamala, to which I said, “Most certainly.” When they inquired as to why, I asked if they would actually listen to my reasons. They did and at the end of our conversation, they were a bit quiet, but said they understood. That was a significant accomplishment, particularly when that individual can be quite adamant in their position as well as how they verbalize said position. They are extremely conservative, a veteran, and a bit serious in their position and how they disagree. What I have learned is to try to understand both their reasoning and their method.
Learning to listen is essential to bridging difficulties, be they between individuals or on a larger scale. Some of what I learned as a 17-20 year old in the Marine Corps continues to serve me well. If you want to see a space where you find a legion of differences, the military will offer that immediately. And yet your life is dependent on making those differences a strength versus a potential weakness. I remember my Drill Instructor saying the only color in our platoon was olive drab. Did we always act that way? Most certainly not, but when something needed to be accomplished, when the proverbial shit was headed to the fan, all hands were on deck quite quickly. What was it what allowed young people (often 18-25) from such divergent backgrounds to pull themselves together in such a manner? As a Marine veteran, I know there is loyalty and connection to set of principles that 80 days of Boot Camp and the title of United States Marine that is unshakeable. There is a commitment to the other that an under-sized 17 year old believed in, ingested if you will, that once present cannot be erased. Even with that there is a degree of caution. Being completely blind to excess is problematic. Patriotism is not necessarily nationalism. And Christian nationalism is not Christianity, something I recently wrote about.
Since I started this blog two days ago, two more people have died in Federal agent shootings. The implying of total immunity for what occurred in Minnesota is absurd. It flies in the face of the principle pari passu or aequalitas ante legem . Equality before and under the law has long been what we profess, in spite of the discrimination that those against any wokeness will admit. It seems the current administration has openly denied that equality at this point. If that is where we are as a nation, it appears the grand experiment has failed. The protests, the filming of what is happening in our cities and streets is one of the few chances we have. If we fail to stand against such tyranny, there is not enough water in Minnesota’s 10,000 lakes to wash away the stain, be it the blood stained snow on Portland Avenue or in the city of Portland. To wash away the chemicals and pepper spray used on protesters. The time to stand is now. The time for Congress to push back is long past, and I am fearful for the country I served.
Bless the protesters for freedom and thank you for reading.
Michael









